State of the Science and Ethical Considerations for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Cystic Kidney Diseases and Ciliopathies.

There is a broad phenotypic spectrum of monogenic polycystic kidney diseases (PKDs). These disorders often involve cilia-related genes and lead to the development of fluid-filled cysts and eventual kidney function decline and failure. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic (PGT-M) disorders has moved into the clinical realm. It allows prospective parents to avoid passing on heritable diseases to their children, including monogenic PKD. The PGT-M process involves embryo generation through in vitro fertilization, with subsequent testing of embryos and selective transfer of those that do not harbor the specific disease-causing variant(s). There is a growing body of literature supporting the success of PGT-M for autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive PKD, although with important technical limitations in some cases. This technology can be applied to many other types of monogenic PKD and ciliopathies despite the lack of existing reports in the literature. PGT-M for monogenic PKD, like other forms of assisted reproductive technology, raises important ethical questions. When considering PGT-M for kidney diseases, as well as the potential to avoid disease in future generations, there are regulatory and ethical considerations. These include limited government regulation and unstandardized consent processes, potential technical errors, high cost and equity concerns, risks associated with pregnancy for mothers with kidney disease, and the impact on all involved in the process, including the children who were made possible with this technology.

Seizure control in women with epilepsy undergoing assisted reproductive technology.

The objective of this study was to determine seizure control in women with epilepsy (WWE) undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Through retrospective chart review, WWE undergoing ART were identified. Demographics and details regarding epilepsy type, seizure control, and ART procedures were extracted. Seizure frequency prior to and during ART were compared. We identified 12 WWE, who underwent 29 embryo transfers, resulting in 16 pregnancies and 10 live births. Nine women were seizure-free at least 2 years before fertility treatment, including three with resolved epilepsy. Seven were on antiseizure medications throughout fertility treatment and pregnancy, with only one on polytherapy. Eleven (all with controlled epilepsy or epilepsy in remission) remained seizure-free throughout fertility treatment. One woman with drug-resistant epilepsy continued to have seizures throughout fertility treatment and pregnancy without an exacerbation of seizure frequency. There was no increased seizure frequency associated with fertility treatment and subsequent pregnancy in this small series of WWE. Although this study was statistically underpowered, our results provide some preliminary evidence that ART might not pose a threat to seizure control, but larger, confirmatory studies are necessary.

Ovulation induction with letrozole and dexamethasone in infertile patients with letrozole-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy of adjuvant dexamethasone during letrozole cycles for ovulation induction (OI) in women with letrozole-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 42 cycles of OI from 28 infertile women with letrozole-resistant PCOS between September 2019 and November 2022. Letrozole was initiated on cycle day 3 for 5 days and increased via a stair-step approach to 7.5 mg as indicated. Patients were deemed letrozole-resistant if no dominant follicle was identified on transvaginal ultrasound following this dose. Resistant patients then received 5 additional days of letrozole 7.5 mg with low-dose dexamethasone 0.5 mg for 7 days and had a repeat ultrasound. The primary outcome was ovulation rate determined by the presence of a dominant follicle on ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included endometrial thickness, number of measurable follicles, and pregnancy outcomes among responders. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 28 (79%) letrozole-resistant PCOS patients had evidence of ovulation after the addition of dexamethasone in 35 out of 42 (83%) cycles. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 20% of ovulatory cycles with a cumulative rate of 32%. All clinical pregnancies resulted in a live birth. Patients who responded to adjuvant dexamethasone were more likely to have a shorter duration of infertility; however, there were no differences in other demographics, serum androgens including DHEA-S, or pretreatment glycemic status. CONCLUSION: Adding dexamethasone to letrozole increased ovulation rates in letrozole-resistant PCOS patients undergoing OI with similar pregnancy outcomes to prior studies. The addition of dexamethasone is an effective, inexpensive, and safe option for PCOS patients otherwise at risk for cycle cancelation.

Outcomes of embryo transfers performed by Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility fellows vs. faculty: an 11-year retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) of embryo transfer episodes (ETEs) performed by Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility fellows vs. those of ETEs performed by faculty physicians. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Academic reproductive endocrinology and infertility practice. PATIENT(S): In total, 3,073 ETEs for 1,488 unique patients were performed by fellows or faculty physicians between January 2009 and January 2020. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate and LBR. RESULT(S): Fifteen fellows performed 1,225 (39.9%) of 3,073 ETEs after completing 30 mock transfers. On comparing outcomes among fellowship years (FY1, FY2, and FY3), CPR (44.1% vs. 43.2% vs. 45.7%, respectively, P = .83) and LBR (39.1% vs. 38.1% vs. 38.4%, respectively, P = .97) were not significantly different. Fellowship year 1 fellows' initial 30 ETEs vs. all the remaining FY1 ETEs had a significantly higher CPR (48.1% vs. 40.5%, respectively, P = .030) and LBR (45.4% vs. 34.3%, respectively, P = .001). There were no significant differences between faculty versus fellow ETEs in terms of CPR (43.0% vs. 45.0%, respectively, P = .30) or LBR (37.3% vs. 39.8%, respectively, P = .16), even after adjusting for patient age, body mass index, primary infertility diagnosis, autologous vs. donor oocyte, fresh vs. frozen embryo, number of embryos transferred, type of transfer catheter, and year of transfer (P = .32 for CPR, P = .22 for LBR). CONCLUSION(S): Appropriately trained FY1 fellows had success rates maintained throughout all FYs. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between fellow- and faculty-performed transfers. These data demonstrated that allowing fellows to perform live embryo transfers is not detrimental to clinical outcomes.

Obstetric outcomes in pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization are not different in fertile, sterilized women compared to infertile women: A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes resulting from assisted reproductive technology in couples with a history of female sterilization to couples with other infertility diagnoses. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Fresh, nondonor cycles excluding gestational surrogacy from 2004 to 2013 in the United States. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preterm birth rates and low birth weight rates from in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies in couples with infertility and in couples with prior tubal ligation as their sole indication for IVF. RESULT(S): The mean ages of fertile women (N = 8,478) and infertile women (N = 371,488) were 35.3 and 34.6 years, respectively. Of the singletons born to parous women (N = 26,463), the incidence of preterm birth was not significantly different in fertile, sterilized couples compared to infertile couples (13.7% vs. 12.0%). The incidence of low birth weight among term singletons was also not significantly different between fertile couples compared to infertile couples (3.5% vs. 3.2%). CONCLUSION(S): Fertile couples have similar preterm birth and low birth weight rates after IVF compared to infertile couples. This suggests that differences in perinatal outcomes may be due to assisted reproductive technology procedures rather than infertility itself.

Delaying Reproductive Aging by Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation: Is it Prime Time?

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autotransplantation can restore ovarian endocrine function and fertility and recently were changed from experimental to fertility preservation procedures for medical indications by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Such advances have resulted in discussions around the utility of ovarian cryopreservation in healthy women to preserve fertility and delay menopause or as a hormone replacement approach. Such 'elective' use of ovarian tissue cryopreservation requires a risk-benefit assessment. Here, we review evidence for and against the utility of ovarian tissue harvesting in healthy women, scrutinize recent and needed advances to enhance the feasibility of such an approach, and provide practice and future research guidelines.

Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocols Alter Endometrial Histomorphology and Gene Expression Profiles.

Although it is well appreciated that ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization (IVF) alter endometrial receptivity, the precise cellular mechanisms are not known. To gain insights into potential mechanisms by which different ovarian stimulation protocols alter the endometrium, we compared histologic and gene expression profiles of endometrium from women undergoing conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF (C-IVF) with those undergoing minimal stimulation with clomiphene citrate (MS-IVF). Sixteen women undergoing MS-IVF (n = 8) or C-IVF (n = 8) were recruited for endometrial biopsy at the time of oocyte retrieval. Endometrial glands were large, tortuous, and secretory with C-IVF but small and undifferentiated with MS-IVF. Whereas RNA sequencing did not reveal changes in estrogen receptor or its co-regulators or classic proliferation associated genes in MS-IVF, together with immunohistochemistry, Wnt signaling was disrupted in endometrium from MS-IVF cycles with significant upregulation of Wnt inhibitors. Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (sFRP1) was increased fourfold (p < 0.01), and sFRP4 was upregulated sixfold (p < 0.01) relative to C-IVF. Further these proteins were localized to subepithelial endometrial stroma. These data indicate that MS-IVF protocols with CC do not seem to impact endometrial estrogen signaling as much as would be expected from the reported antiestrogenic properties of CC. Rather, the findings of this study highlight Wnt signaling as a major factor for endometrial development during IVF cycles.

Thrombin Alters Human Endometrial Stromal Cell Differentiation During Decidualization.

Vaginal bleeding and subchorionic hematomas are associated with increased risk of both early and late pregnancy loss. Thrombin generation may play a pivotal role in the development of these complications. To determine the effects of thrombin on human endometrial stromal cells (hESCs), cells were treated with thrombin at baseline or during decidualization with cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)+medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). Next-generation RNA sequencing revealed that markers of decidualization (IGF-1, IGFBP-1, and prolactin [PRL]) were induced after the initiation of decidualization, whereas thrombin suppressed insulin-like growth factor ( IGF)-1, Insulin-like growth factor binding protein ( IGFBP)-1, and PRL gene expression at baseline and during decidualization. These effects were mediated through protease activated receptor (PAR)-1- and PAR-1-independent pathways. Thrombin decreased the secretion of a key marker of decidualization (PRL), altered the morphological transformation of decidualizing hESCs, and activated genes involved in matrix degradation and proinflammatory chemokines ( Interleukin-8 and Interleukin-6). Genes encoding factors important for matrix stability ( Col1α1, LOX) were suppressed. We suggest that intrauterine bleeding and generation of thrombin accentuates leukocyte extravasation and endometrial inflammation, impairs decidualization, and endometrial support of early pregnancy.

Estrogen-regulated miRNA-27b is altered by bisphenol A in human endometrial stromal cells.

MicroRNAs (miRs) are small molecules important for regulation of transcription and translation. The objective was to identify hormonally regulated miRs in human endometrial stromal cells and to determine the impact of the endocrine disruptor, bisphenol A (BPA), on those miRs. miR microarray analysis and multiple confirmatory cell preparations treated with 17ß-estradiol (E2) and BPA altered miR-27b, let-7c, let-7e and miR-181b. Further, decidualization downregulated miR-27b. VEGFB and VEGFC were validated as targets of miR-27b. Identification of miR-27b target genes suggests that BPA and E2 downregulate miR-27b thereby leading to upregulation of genes important for vascularization and angiogenesis of the endometrium during the menstrual cycle and decidualization.

Androgens Upregulate Endometrial Epithelial Progesterone Receptor Expression: Potential Implications for Endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Androgenic compounds have been implicated in induction of endometrial atrophy yet the mechanisms of androgen effects on human endometrium have not been well studied. We hypothesized that androgens may promote their endometrial effects via modulation of progesterone receptor (PR) expression. METHODS: Proliferative phase endometrial samples were collected at the time of hysterectomy. We evaluated the effect of the potent androgen 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on endometrial PR expression by treating human endometrial explants, endometrial stromal cells, and Ishikawa cells with DHT. Ishikawa cells were also treated with DHT ± the androgen receptor (AR) blocker flutamide. The PR-B, total PR messenger RNA (mRNA), and PR protein expression were assessed. Expression of cyclin D1 and D2 was checked as markers of cell proliferation. RESULTS: As expected, estradiol induced PR expression in isolated stromal cells, endometrial epithelial cells, and tissue explants. The DHT treatment also resulted in increased PR expression in endometrial explants and Ishikawa cells but not in stromal cells. Further, protein levels of both nuclear PR isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) were induced with the DHT treatment. Although flutamide treatment alone did not affect PR expression, flutamide diminished androgen-induced upregulation of PR in both endometrial explants and Ishikawa cells. Although estradiol induced both cyclin D1 and cyclin D2 mRNA, DHT did not induce these markers of cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Androgens may mediate endometrial effects through upregulation of PR gene and protein expression. Endometrial PR upregulation by androgens is mediated, at least in part, through AR.

Shifting paradigms in diminished ovarian reserve and advanced reproductive age in assisted reproduction: customization instead of conformity.

As women are increasingly delaying childbearing into their 30s and beyond, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and advanced reproductive age (ARA) patients are bound to become a large proportion of all assisted reproductive technology practices. Traditional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for DOR and/or ARA have had some limited success, but pregnancy rates are lower and cycle cancellation rates are higher than their younger counterparts with normal ovarian reserve. Though many physicians have a selection of favorite standard protocols that they use, patients with DOR may require closer monitoring and customization of the treatment cycle to address the common problems that come with low ovarian reserve. Frequent issues that surface in women with DOR and/or ARA include poor follicular response, premature luteinizing hormone surge, and poor embryo quality. Limited published evidence exists to guide treatment for DOR. However, use of minimal or mild doses of gonadotropins, avoidance of severe pituitary suppression, and consideration for luteal phase stimulation and a "freeze all" approach are possible customized treatment options that can be considered for such patients who have failed more traditional COS protocols.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection indications: how rigorous?

Up to 15% of all couples of reproductive age are diagnosed with subfertility and about one-third of those will have male factor infertility as a contributing factor. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has proven to be invaluable for couples with severely compromised semen parameters. Since its introduction into the clinical practice in 1992, the indications for ICSI were dramatically expanded to include various patient populations with normal or mildly abnormal semen parameters. Moreover, some fertility programs choose to perform ICSI for all of their patients needing assisted reproductive technologies. By all means, the male factor indications for ICSI are not well defined, apart from its absolute utility with surgically obtained spermatozoa in the presence of low motility, or in cases of severe defects with sperm concentration and motility. Based on current evidence, ICSI is not indicated for routine use. Its adoption for previous history of total fertilization failure, in vitro oocyte maturation, cryopreserved oocytes, polyploidy prevention, poor-quality oocytes, diminished ovarian reserve, and advanced reproductive age are not supported by current evidence, albeit further research with well-designed studies is warranted. Finally, from a biological standpoint ICSI is considered to be more invasive, more energy consuming for the oocyte itself and its adverse genetic and epigenetic effects cannot be ruled out. Although more studies are needed to clarify definitive indications for ICSI, many of its current applications can be deemed empiric at this time.

Evaluation of ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation in children undergoing gonadotoxic therapies.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation are the only fertility preservation options for sexually immature individuals. Because of their experimental nature, it is important to determine safety and possible bundling with other medicallyindicated procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. RESULTS: Cryopreservation indications included cancer in 75 % of females and 50 % of males, while non-cancer indications included various hematological conditions. Similar numbers of females (12/28) and males (3/9) underwent prior chemotherapy. Females underwent laparoscopic (27/28) or robotic (1/28) approaches while incisional biopsy was used in males. Bundling of ovarian and testicular harvesting with other medicallyindicated procedures was performed in 42 % and 22 %, respectively. The operative time inclusive of bundled procedures was similar (1.6 ± 0.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 h) but the discharge time was significantly longer for females than males (10.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.6 ± 0.6 h, p<0.05) due to frequent bundling of medically-indicated procedures in females. All procedures were successfully completed without complications or significant blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric gonadal tissue cryopreservation can be combined with other medically-indicated procedures to minimize the potential inconvenience, additional anesthetic risks, and costs.

Association of BRCA1 mutations with occult primary ovarian insufficiency: a possible explanation for the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks.

PURPOSE: Germline mutations in BRCA genes are associated with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. Because infertility is associated with breast and ovarian cancer risks, we hypothesized that the mutations in the BRCA gene may be associated with low response to fertility treatments. METHODS: We performed ovarian stimulation in 126 women with breast cancer by using letrozole and gonadotropins for the purpose of fertility preservation by embryo or oocyte cryopreservation. As surrogates of ovarian reserve, the oocyte yield and the incidence of low response were compared with ovarian stimulation according to BRCA mutation status. RESULTS: Of the 82 women who met the inclusion criteria, 47 women (57%) had undergone BRCA testing, and 14 had a mutation in BRCA genes, of which two were of clinically undetermined significance. In BRCA mutation-positive patients, low ovarian response rate was significantly higher compared with BRCA mutation-negative patients (33.3 v 3.3%; P = .014) and with BRCA-untested women (2.9%; P = .012). All BRCA mutation-positive low responders had BRCA1 mutations, but low response was not encountered in women who were only BRCA2 mutation positive. Compared with controls, BRCA1 mutation- but not BRCA2 mutation-positive women produced lower numbers of eggs (7.4 [95% CI, 3.1 to 17.7] v 12.4 [95% CI, 10.8 to 14.2]; P = .025) and had as many as 38.3 times the odds ratio of low response (95% CI, 4.1 to 353.4; P = .001). CONCLUSION: BRCA1 mutations are associated with occult primary ovarian insufficiency. This finding may, at least in part, explain the link between infertility and breast/ovarian cancer risks.